Choose which layers your team will own
Choose which layers your team will own across uploads, format normalization, reference management, variant annotation, interpretation, policy, and UI contracts. A stable API can supply several of these layers, while consent, product judgment, and clinical boundaries remain the product team's responsibility.
Design uploads and jobs for genome-sized files
Start with an explicit upload flow for supported WGS VCF/VCF.GZ files. Store an immutable source record, enqueue analysis, poll for a result, then render findings with provenance, coverage, confidence, and clear wellness language.
Design for partial data from day one. A person may begin with genetics only, then add labs or wearables later. Your dashboard should remain useful with one modality and expand honestly as more sources are connected.
Reference architecture for a first release
Create an upload session through the authenticated API, send the large file directly to private object storage, complete the session, and enqueue analysis. Return a source identifier immediately and a job identifier after analysis starts. Let the client poll job status or consume a completion webhook.
The worker should validate format, compression, sample count, reference assembly where possible, and quality prerequisites before expensive work. Store the pipeline version and input checksum. Results should link back to the source and expose warnings as structured fields.
Build, buy, or compose
Owning the pipeline provides maximum control and demands sustained bioinformatics, infrastructure, security, and evidence maintenance. A managed API shortens delivery time and creates a vendor dependency. A local open-source path can suit teams that need data control and can operate the stack.
Run one representative file through the complete lifecycle before deciding. Measure engineering time, queue behavior, output depth, provenance, error quality, deletion, and the work required to turn results into a useful member experience.
- Upload and storage
- Reference and annotation resources
- Worker runtime and observability
- Interpretation policy and evidence updates
- Dashboard and agent-facing contracts
Genome API proof-of-concept gate
- A VCF.GZ uploads directly to private storage
- Completion and analysis calls are idempotent
- Job status and failures are machine-readable
- Every output carries source and pipeline version
- Cross-user and cross-organization reads fail safely
- Export and deletion remove the expected artifacts
Use a hosted genetics workflow with visible lineage
WellNizz exposes genetics uploads, queued analysis, ancestry, provider discovery, health context, dashboard specifications, and action plans through one REST and MCP surface. Its renderer-neutral dashboard contract separates analysis facts from visual design, so teams can keep their own product language.
Define the product's interpretation boundary
Genome analysis creates high expectations. State the product's interpretation scope, surface source and method metadata, and route clinically significant questions to qualified care. Automated recommendations should stay within the published wellness policy.
Editorial sources
Read the primary guidance
These sources support the technical and health boundaries in this article. Provider prices, availability, and product terms should always be checked at the provider before purchase.
- VCF specificationGlobal Alliance for Genomics and Health
- A Guide to Interpreting Genomic ReportsNational Human Genome Research Institute
- OpenAPI Specification 3.1OpenAPI Initiative
Questions, answered
FAQ
What should a WGS API return?
Useful outputs include normalized observations, interpretation context, source provenance, confidence or quality information, and structured objects that a product can render.
Can a WGS API support agents?
Yes, when it exposes narrowly scoped, auditable operations through a contract such as REST or MCP and requires explicit user authorization.